Financier Carl Icahn and creditor groups of bankrupt car parts company Federal-Mogul Corp. reportedly said they made a “fair offer” to keep a UK pension plan funded, but the fund administrator is threatening to shut the fund down.

According to Reuters, the issue, which has generated considerable controversy in Britain, revolves around the pension fund covering some 40,000 current and former workers at Federal-Mogul’s UK subsidiary Turner & Newall.

Southfield, Michigan-based Federal-Mogul, which makes Champion spark plugs and other car parts, is operating under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, throwing future funding for the UK pension fund in doubt, the report noted.

The plan’s administrator reportedly says the fund would face a $1.5 billion deficit if it were to be shut down, a move that would leave many T&N workers with a fraction of what they are owed. The plan administrators say without more capital, they may be forced to close it.

Icahn, a prominent US multi-billionaire who is by far the largest holder of Federal-Mogul bonds, told Reuters he has offered to buy the UK T&N assets for $US700 million, of which $130 million would go toward funding the pension scheme.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Officials from Federal-Mogul, its creditors, Icahn and various others met this week in New York to negotiate a settlement for the pension scheme, but so far no resolution has been achieved, the report added.

Icahn’s bonds are expected to be converted into equity under a plan of reorganisation that Southfield, Michigan-based Federal-Mogul reportedly is working to devise.

In an interview, Icahn told Reuters he is facing resistance from “certain people with certain agendas who would like to see it go into liquidation.” He did not disclose who those people are.

“There would be no necessity to terminate the pension plan under our offer, which in my opinion is more than anyone else would pay for the assets,” Icahn told Reuters. “We made an offer that is better than anyone else for the assets.”

Reuters noted that the prospect of Icahn owning T&N has raised fears in the UK that the often-described “corporate raider” would engage in a programme of “asset stripping” that would throw hundreds of workers out of their jobs, according to union officials.

But Icahn reportedly said his intention is to build both Federal-Mogul and T&N and make them into successful companies. Icahn said he owns more than 20 companies and has “put a lot of capital into them.”

“We have sold very few companies,” Icahn, whose holdings include real estate, casinos, telecommunication companies and others, told Reuters. “I believe Federal-Mogul will not only survive but prosper greatly.”

Peter Wolfson, a lawyer who represents the Federal-Mogul creditors committee, told the news agency the offer by Icahn and creditors would allow the fund to continue to operate and grow its assets over the years.

“It would be the dumbest thing I ever heard of to shut it down,” Wolfson, who was involved in the talks, told Reuters. “We think shutting it down would be totally irresponsible.”

Wolfson, a lawyer for Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, reportedly said Federal-Mogul is under no obligation to continue to fund the pension scheme.

“If we are not able to reach a consensual plan with the pension trustee or the pension administrator, and they decide to liquidate it, we have no objection to that,” Wolfson told Reuters. “We are going to give them some money that in our judgment is more than they would get in a liquidation.”