A top private equity investor has questioned the logic of a deal by Ford that could spin off British car brands Jaguar and Land Rover to an Indian car maker, combining ultra-luxury with ultra-cheap vehicles in a single company.
“I don’t understand how a company that’s going to make cars for $US2,000 can sell cars for $120,000,” Thomas Stallkamp, a partner with private equity firm Ripplewood Holdings, which had been among the bidders for Jaguar and Land Rover, told Reuters.
“The specifics of how you merge a car company that’s hardly a car company right now with those iconic brands is somewhat problematic,” Stallkamp, who is also the former president of Chrysler, said at the Reuters Autos Summit in Detroit on Sunday.
Ford has narrowed the auction of Jaguar and Land Rover to three bids. Remaining bidders include Indian car maker Tata Motors and rival Mahindra & Mahindra which has teamed up with buy-out firm Apollo.
The automaker has been exploring a sale of the brands since June and has said it expects to strike a deal by early next year at the latest. The brands have been valued by a Merrill Lynch analyst at as much as $US1.5bn combined.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataStallkamp, who said he was disappointed that Ripplewood’s bid was dropped, told Reuters he did not see any synergies between the current operations of Tata Motors, India’s top vehicle maker, and the British brands.
“I think they would have to run it as a separate company,” Stallkamp said. “It may not be even part of the motor company because the motor company is pretty well tapped out for its own credit and Tata has all kinds of holdings.”
“I don’t see the synergies of it,” he added. “It may be worth more to them strategically.”