A German court has rejected a claim for damages by DaimlerChrysler AG shareholders who said the company did not announce in proper time that former CEO Juergen Schrempp planned to step down.


According to the Associated Press (AP), the Stuttgart state court ruled that the July 2005 announcement had been made in a timely way.


According to the report, the court found that the company had no obligation to announce Schrempp’s departure before its supervisory board made a formal decision, and was not obliged to announce earlier that discussions had taken place on a possible changeover.


Schrempp was replaced as CEO by Dieter Zetsche and news of his departure sent the stock up 10%, dismaying investors who had sold shares in the preceding days, AP added.


According to the news agency, Steffen Nolte, an official with DaimlerChrysler’s legal department, welcomed the ruling, and added that plaintiffs were seeking about EUR6.5m ($US8.5m) in damages.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Felix Weigend, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, told the Associated Press they would take their case to Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and criticised the court’s failure to hear evidence in the case.