View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Interview
March 5, 2010

INTERVIEW: JD Power’s Dave Sargent and Jeff Schuster on the 2010 outlook

For those who thought things in the automotive world couldn't get any wilder, a look at recent headlines about Toyota and other auto manufacturers' woes suggests that turmoil and change may be the industry's only constants, going forward. Two JD Power execs discuss the outlook in North America.

For those who thought things in the automotive world couldn’t get any wilder, a look at recent headlines about Toyota and other auto manufacturers’ woes suggests that turmoil and change may be the industry’s only constants, going forward. Two JD Power execs discuss the outlook in North America.

US sales at the beginning of 2010 are sending mixed signals about an impending recovery. Although sales reached the 10.8 million mark in January, they hit a speed bump in February. The situation at Toyota seems unlikely to settle down anytime soon, JD Power says. Two of JD Power’s senior automotive executives, Jeff Schuster, executive director of automotive forecasting, and Dave Sargent, vice president of vehicle research, discuss the outlook.

Let’s start with what is without a doubt the biggest issue of the new year: the spate of safety-related recalls at Toyota.  How will that impact the automaker’s image as the industry’s quality leader?  How will it affect sales, and who might stand to benefit most?

Sargent: Toyota has been a quality leader in the US since J.D. Power started measuring the entire industry in the mid-1980s. Great quality is the cornerstone of how it built its reputation, so it must do everything it can to protect this.  Toyota by its own admission was slow in fully reacting to the situation.  However, it is clearly taking responsibility for the problems and is taking steps to ensure that its vehicles are safe.  This is critical, as regaining its reputation among consumers is more important than short-term sales and profits.

Schuster: How much of an impact this has on sales will no doubt depend on how long the situation continues and how consumers respond to how Toyota is dealing with the recalls.  In February, Toyota’s total sales were down 11 percent from one year ago.  For comparison, the industry was up 13 percent for the same period. Toyota’s share of the industry declined to 10.7 percent in February 2010, compared with 13.5 percent in February 2009.  There is no question we are seeing a negative impact currently. As the situation drags on, there is an increasing probability that the impact could shift from affecting sales within 2010 alone to a longer-term problem.

We’re coming off one of the worst years the auto industry has ever experienced.  Is the worst over?

Schuster: No question, 2009 was a difficult year, and we believe the worst is over. We’re currently forecasting total auto sales at 11.7 million units, or 9.6 million at the retail level, both representing a 13 percent increase from dismal 2009.  That doesn’t mean 2010 is without risk.  The key variables are the pace of the country’s general economic recovery, with a focus on unemployment; the availability of credit; what manufacturers do in terms of pricing and incentives, which they insist they’re going to cut; and the general level of consumer confidence.

What does the industry need to do to regain consumer confidence and rebuild demand?

Sargent: The recovery of the industry as a whole is dependent on the wider economic picture, but for individual automakers, the key is to maintain a portfolio of products that meet consumers’ needs for value, quality, performance, economy and utility, as well as less tangible attributes such as excellent styling and a strong brand image.

How does the auto industry look beyond 2010?  Will we get back to the 16- to 17-million-unit sales levels we saw in 2000 through 2007? Or is there a new norm?

Schuster: We are projecting a slow and steady recovery during the next few years, but we’ve gone through some significant structural changes that will likely lead to a permanent decline in the level of “normal” sales. We don’t expect light-vehicle volumes to cross the 15-million-unit level until 2012, but they should reach 16 million by 2014.  This is more of a function of stable replacement demand and the addition of new households, with less focus on fleet sales.

Some say the industry needs to focus on consumers, rather than daily rental fleets.  Is that happening?

Schuster: A significant amount of “bad” fleet was removed from the system, with fleets accounting for just 17 percent of sales in 2009, down from 22 percent in 2005.  Most of the reduction was with daily rentals, which is a low-profit business.  Cutting excess capacity helps the industry–and especially domestic brands–shift to a healthier mix.  The question going forward is: Will manufacturers remain disciplined throughout the recovery and the “new normal?”

We’ve seen an unusual level of cooperation between the auto industry and the government.  Was this a rare exception or a permanent shift?

Sargent: Short of another financial collapse of any of the domestic automakers, we would expect direct government involvement to wane over time.  However, the government will clearly continue to play a key role in terms of the legislative and regulatory environment covering issues like fuel economy, emissions and safety.  It is very unlikely that this will diminish over time.  It is more likely to increase.

Has the industry done enough to bring North American capacity in line with demand?  If not, what else needs be done?  And what about the rest of the world?

Schuster: The industry has taken out 1.2 million units of capacity since 2006, most of that by the domestic brands.  The foreign-owned makers have actually added capacity and shifted from importing vehicles to building them domestically.  I think there is a need for a further reduction in capacity globally, as there has been less cutting in other parts of the developed world, notably Western Europe, Japan and Korea. Whether we’ll need further cuts in North America will depend on the pace of recovery and the long-term level of demand, but there is risk that over-capacity will remain an issue.

Speaking of imports, India’s Mahindra is poised to enter the American market with two trucks, while several Chinese makers want to crack the market. Will that finally happen this year?

Schuster: Mahindra is planning to enter the U.S. market this year, but the volume is expected to be low.  Chinese brands are later in the future.  There have been many announcements, but the launch of significant Chinese vehicles is not expected during the next few years. There’s a lot involved with bringing a new brand to the market. They would not only have to develop the right products, but also set up a dealer base, develop their marketing and get all of the infrastructure in place, and those things take time.  While we fully expect both Indian and Chinese makers to make a push into North America, the reality is that any significant volume is still a few years away.

We’ve been seeing huge strides in quality at Ford and General Motors.  Will that pay off for them?

Sargent: While we don’t predict future quality scores, we would not be surprised to see both Ford and GM score even more quality gains in the near term.  The key challenges are, as always, the launch of new models and, in particular, the launch and proliferation of new technologies in these models.  Making high-tech systems as flawless and intuitive as possible will be a key battleground for all of the automakers in the future.

What about Chrysler? Even its management has openly admitted it has some serious quality problems.  Can it survive if it doesn’t reach world-class levels?

Sargent: The simple answer is that no automaker will survive over the long term without competitive quality levels, and these days that requires world-class quality.  This is the price of entry, and any automaker that has serious quality deficiencies will see its reputation–and ultimately its ability to earn viable profits–diminish rapidly. There is no doubt that Chrysler understands the importance of quality and its impact on business performance.  If Chrysler attacks the quality issue with the same level of determination and rigor as automakers such as Ford, GM, Hyundai and Volkswagen, then it should be able to close the gap over time.  We certainly think they have the determination and ability to do so.  The toughest part will be closing the perceived quality gap with consumers.  As other automakers have found, this is harder than closing the actual quality gap.

Are small cars really the next growth segment?

Schuster:  Small vehicles have been getting a large amount of attention.  There is no question that consumers respond to increases in gas prices by shifting their purchase decisions downward.  However, the true demand for small vehicles will be tested over the next three years, as nearly one-half of new models will be small.  While I believe consumers are becoming more accepting of small vehicles, the industry may be going too far too soon.

NEWSLETTER Sign up Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. The top stories of the day delivered to you every weekday. A weekly roundup of the latest news and analysis, sent every Monday. The industry's most comprehensive news and information delivered every quarter.
I consent to GlobalData UK Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy


Thank you for subscribing to Just Auto