California State Senator Dean Florez has modified Senate Bill 708 which originally threatened to repeal the state’s current rolling emissions test exemption for motor vehicles 30 years old and older. It sought to revoke the current pro-industry/ pro-hobbyist exemption and replace it with an exemption for vehicles that are 45 or more model years old commencing January 1, 2005. A SEMA-drafted alternative that beefs up the existing California law prohibiting the operation of “smoking” motor vehicles will replace the original bill.
SEMA is the Specialty Equipment Market Association, a trade association with more than 4,500 member companies.

“California officials continue to develop strategies to address failed efforts to meet air quality goals. Old cars often are targeted as convenient scapegoats,” said SEMA government affairs director Steve McDonald. “Over time Senator Florez has become convinced that the antique and classic vehicles that benefit from the current emissions exemption are overwhelmingly well-maintained and infrequently driven. Forcing these vehicles back into the Smog Check program represented flawed environmental policy and created no real benefit to the quality of the air breathed by state residents. We are thrilled that Senator Florez ultimately agreed with our assessment.”

The new S.B. 708 increases fines for violators of the state’s current law prohibiting vehicles that emit excessive smoke. This legislation also adds vehicles cited for a smoking vehicle violation to those eligible for the state’s Consumer Assistance Programme that provides financial repair assistance up to $US500 for certain low-income vehicle owners who qualify. “This alternative will result in real, verifiable emission reductions that help eliminate a significant source of pollution, and it does so without harm to consumers and hobbyists alike,” said SEMA technical consultant Frank Bohanan. “The repair assistance provisions will likely reduce drivers’ operating costs in addition to helping clear the air.”

In seeking this alternative, Senator Florez acknowledged the thousands of phone calls and letters opposing his original bill that were generated by the California vehicle hobbyist community and related industry members.

“California SEMA Action Network (SAN) car clubs and individual hobbyists did outstanding work in opposing the original S.B. 708. Within minutes after sending our legislative alerts, the phone calls, faxes and email began pouring into Sacramento,” said SAN director Brian Caudill. “California hobbyists provided the passion and the horsepower which enabled SEMA to make our arguments to Senator Florez. This is exactly how our enthusiast-industry partnership is supposed to work.”

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Existing law in California exempted all pre-1974 vehicles from emissions testing until January 1, 2003. After Jan. 1, vehicles 30-years old and older are exempt from emissions testing. This law, enacted in 1997, acknowledges the minimal impact of vehicles 30-years old and older on vehicle emissions and air quality. Vehicles 30-years old and older constitute a small portion of the overall vehicle population in California and are regarded by clean air regulators and industry watchdogs as a poor source from which to look for emissions reduction.