General Motors close to finalising a package of proposed fixes for the Chevrolet Volt battery pack that engineers believe would eliminate the risk of a fire being triggered days after a crash, two people with knowledge of the situation have said.
The proposed repairs under consideration would involve laminating circuitry in the Volt’s 400-pound battery pack, reinforcing the case surrounding the lithium-ion battery and better protecting the coolant system from leaks in a severe crash, the sources told Reuters.
Go deeper with GlobalData
GM has acted quickly to address concerns about the Volt after US safety regulators opened an investigation into the fire risk from the plug-in hybrid’s battery pack last month.
A relatively quick repair that could be completed for owners at GM dealerships could spare the automaker the cost and reputation damage from a more involved safety recall, Reuters noted.
Engineers are expected to update senior management by the end of the week on what could be a relatively low-cost way to fix the more than 6,000 Volts now on US roads, one of the sources said.
The cost of the fixes under consideration could total less than US$9m for GM, or about $1,000 per Volt, the sources said. That could include the labour for repairs at dealerships. The costs could rise if US regulators press for a more involved solution, the sources said.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a probe of the Volt’s battery pack last month. NHTSA, which has the power to review proposed safety fixes by automakers, had no immediate comment.
GM spokesman Rob Peterson told Reuters engineers were still working on the problem. “To the best of my knowledge, we’re not discussing exact solutions at this point,” he said.
A lithium-ion battery pack in a Volt that went through a crash test in May caught fire three weeks later at a NHTSA test facility in Wisconsin.
In lab tests completed in late November by US regulators, a second Volt pack began to smoke and throw off sparks while a third battery pack caught fire a week after a simulated crash.
GM executives have said the Volt’s battery pack would be safe during and immediately after any crash and that problems were not linked to any flaw in battery cells supplied by South Korea’s LG Chem.
GM said the Volt is safe and has rushed to reassure early buyers with what it has called a “white-glove” approach.
The automaker offered loaner cars to the more than 6,000 Volt owners while the safety investigation continues.
Chief executive Dan Akerson subsequently raised the ante days later by vowing to buy back any Volts if consumers had concerns, an unusual if not unprecedented step.
Akerson told Reuters last week that the automaker might need to redesign the Volt battery. GM officials have said the engineering fixes would likely stop far short of a clean-slate redesign for the vehicle’s most expensive component.
An influential insurance group, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, said on Monday it had no plans to strip the Volt of its “five-star” safety rating. The ratings from the group are closely watched by consumers and often used in automakers’ marketing.
NHTSA also has no plans to change the Volt’s “five-star” safety rating, another key resource for consumers.
Separately in Washington, a congressional committee overseeing NHTSA said it would hold a hearing as early as next month on the agency’s response to the Volt fires, Reuters added.
The regulatory subcommittee of the House Oversight panel wants to know why it took nearly six months for the matter to become public and whether the committee should have been advised.
NHTSA said time spent between the first fire last spring and incidents in testing in November involved careful analysis to identify the problem and ensure that it was not an anomaly.
Transportation officials have said that the car is safe.
