While Toyota and Honda still have a commanding lead in good relations with their suppliers and are the preferred automakers in the US to do business with, efforts by Ford and General Motors to improve relations with their suppliers may be starting to work, according to results of an annual study of OEM-Tier 1 supplier working relations.
Go deeper with GlobalData
The survey by Birmingham, Michigan-based Planning Perspectives (PPI) found that the principal reason for the improved supplier working relations at Ford and General Motors is that both OEMs are providing more timely and adequate information to suppliers than had been done in previous years. The improved communication leads to greater trust, both of which are important components of strong working relations
“This is good news for Ford and General Motors. It appears they have bottomed out and the programmes they announced last year to improve their relations with suppliers are starting to have the desired effect,” said PPI president and CEO John Henke.
In addition, this year’s study shows that overall, with the exception of Honda, the OEMs are working harder to improve their relations with their largest suppliers than with their smaller suppliers. Honda tends to treat all of its suppliers the same.
For instance, Ford’s and GM’s largest suppliers scored the two automakers higher than their smaller suppliers in several important areas including the amount of help the OEM provided them, the level of timely and adequate communication of important data which also positively impacts trust, the suppliers’ ability to recover some costs, and the best suppliers being rewarded with new business.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalData“This emphasis on larger suppliers – particularly by GM and Ford – would seem to be in keeping with their previously announced plans to reduce the overall number of their suppliers in favour of fewer larger, more capable global suppliers,” noted Henke.
The annual study rates the three domestic automakers – GM, Ford and Chrysler Group, and the Big Three Japanese OEMS, Toyota, Honda and Nissan – on their working relations with their suppliers.
Of the six automakers, the US OEMs have been on the bottom half of the scale with GM the lowest, since the survey’s inception in 2002, and the Japanese automakers on the top half with Toyota having the best rating.
In 2006, GM still ranks at the bottom of the scale with a ranking of 131 which is a 17 point gain over last year, and Ford is next at 174, also a 17 point gain. Chrysler, with a ranking of 218 – a 22 point gain over 2005 – continues its five-year trend of small, but steady annual improvements and leads the US automakers.
The Japanese, however, remain well ahead and have by far the best working relations with their suppliers. Toyota ranked 407, Honda 368 and Nissan 300. All three are at virtually the same ranking they were last year.
“This is surprising, particularly for Honda and Toyota, both of whom place considerable emphasis on strong supplier working relations. It appears as if they have reached the best relations they can achieve, given current efforts,” Henke said.
Among the six automakers, Toyota’s electrical and electronics group has the best working relations in the industry of any OEM buying group, and GM’s body-in-white group by far the worst.
“Supplier working relations within each OEM vary among the various purchasing areas, indicating that it is the OEM personnel who have the day-to-day responsibility of working with suppliers that are the primary determinants of the overall supplier relations. This indicates the importance of having performance metrics in place to drive the desired behavior of these individuals,” said Henke.
“While Ford and GM have shown some small gains overall, they have a long way to go to reach the level of Honda and Toyota and it’s going to take a real corporate commitment on the part of each companies’ management team to keep things going in the right direction and continue improving. Part of this commitment must include having the performance metrics in place that will continue to drive the behaviour that brought about the change suppliers experienced during the past year.”
Large or small, suppliers are still shifting more resources to the Japanese automakers at the expense of the US domestics. This year’s study shows that suppliers are continuing to shift capital investment and research and development expenditures to their Japanese customers and decreasing somewhat their investments in the US automakers.
“Suppliers are also providing more year-over-year improvements in product quality to Honda, Toyota, and Nissan, than they are to Chrysler, Ford, and GM, primarily in response to the greater price reduction pressures they are receiving from the domestic OEMs,” said Henke.
The shift in resources and investment to the Japanese automakers is not a new phenomenon. It began to show up in the 2003 study, continued in 2004, accelerated in 2005 and continues this year.
In fact, according to one aspect of the study which compares OEMs’ emphasis on cost versus quality, suppliers say that GM is five times more focused on cost than quality, Ford and Chrysler four times, while Nissan is 2.5 times, and Honda and Toyota only 1.7 times when selecting suppliers. The lower the number, the more the OEM balances quality with cost.
According to the study, 60% of GM suppliers and 34% of Ford suppliers would “prefer not to do business” with the automaker or are “ambivalent” about it, compared to only 3% of Honda’s and 2% of Toyota’s suppliers.
Conversely, 72% of Toyota’s suppliers and 55% of Honda’s rate those OEMs as “very preferred” or “most preferred” to do business with, compared to only 5% of GM and 10% of Ford’s suppliers rating them as preferred.
