Volkswagen is reportedly taking legal action against the mystery duo who made the controversial suicide bomber short film that apparently shows an Arab blowing himself up in a Polo car.
Go deeper with GlobalData
The Guardian newspaper’s website MediaGuardian.co.uk said that, after a week of prevarication, the car giant has decided to go ahead and sue the people behind the advert on the grounds that it was damaging its reputation around the world and falsely linked the VW with terrorism.
“We are taking legal action but because it’s early stages we cannot comment further,” a Volkswagen spokesman told MediaGuardian.co.uk.
But the company reportedly privately admitted that it cannot locate Lee and Dan, the London based advertising creative partnership who dreamed up the film, which has been seen around the world via the internet.
“We are prepared to pursue the two individuals but need to locate them to ensure the success of our legal claim,” the company said in a private memo, details of which have been obtained by MediaGuardian.co.uk.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataThe report said the short film is made in the style of a TV advert and shows a man hopping into the car wearing the distinctive black and white kaffiyeh scarf commonly worn in the Arab world and made famous by the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.
In the advert, the man drives around London streets before blowing himself up outside a restaurant – apparently killing himself but leaving the car intact. Then the slogan, “Polo: small but tough”, appears, the report said.
Volkswagen has consistently denied having anything to do with the advert, MediaGuardian.co.uk reported.
It said both Lee and Dan have apologised for the film, which they said had a £40,000 budget, but have refused to identify themselves or explain how it was funded.
However, MediaGuardian.co.uk tracked down the director of the spoof advert, Stuart Fryer, 35, who reportedly said he was horrified by the reaction to the ad and had only ever meant it to be used on a showreel and never seen by the public.
He reportedly disputed Lee and Dan’s estimate of its £40,000 cost, saying the cost had been “more like £400”.
“If it cost that much I would like to know where the money went,” Fryer told MediaGuardian.co.uk. “It was made in my spare time. It’s remarkable what you can do for such a low budget.
“I just wanted it for show reel purposes, not seen by millions of people around the world.
“I don’t want to offend people, I just want to make advertisements.I wanted to show it to the Saatchis and BBHs of this world.
“Little did I know that the advert that I made would be sent out on the internet and create such a fuss – it’s shocked me.”
This is the second online advertisement to cause controversy in the UK in the past year.
Last April, an campaign for Ford went badly wrong, leaving the US carmaker accused of bad taste over the depiction of its then-new SportKa decapitating a cat.
Ford’s European operation and Ogilvy & Mather, its advertising agency, subsequently began an investigation into how a proposed ad – which both insisted had been rejected – had begun circulating on the internet.
Animal protection groups attacked the “abhorrent” advert, which showed a ginger cat having its head cut off by the sunroof before its dead body slid down the bonnet.
