Unwilling to impose a robust in-service emission testing regime like other OECD countries, the New Zealand government has chosen to monitor the exhaust emissions of “our third-world vehicle fleet” in the most simplistic way possible, according to the country’s Motor Industry Association, which represents new vehicle importers.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
“A simple visual test for smoke emissions might be better than nothing at all, but it cannot possibly address the whole cocktail of emissions, many of which are invisible,” said MIA CEO Perry Kerr.
“We’re killing 400 people a year through vehicle emissions, the same number that die due to road crashes, yet the government refuses to adopt a responsible approach to the situation.”
The MIA claimed that New Zealand’s vehicle emissions problem is exacerbated by the fact that the country’s vehicle fleet is ageing due to the huge number of older used imports crossing the wharves.
Fewer than 15% of recent used imports were under five years old, nullifying the rapid progress that the new vehicle industry has been making in minimising exhaust emissions. This in itself should be justification to have a particularly stringent emissions testing regime, yet the government continues to avoid its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol by paying lip service to the problem, the MIA claimed.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalData“Recent comments would suggest that there is more interest at ministerial level regarding saving whales than there is in minimising human loss of life through exhaust pollution,” said Kerr.
The MIA noted that the Japanese city of Tokyo is now banning diesel vehicles over seven years old unless it can be proven that they can meet the emission standards currently demanded of new vehicles.
“This will be yet another opportunity for used importers to make money from vehicles with no value in Japan by unloading them on the New Zealand market,” Kerr claimed.
“We are truly naive in our continuing role as the dumping ground for other countries’ environmental problems, but we also have to question the morality of the Japanese government in allowing the export of vehicles which are illegal to use in Japan.”
The MIA said it is running out of patience with the current government on this issue.
“We’ve had a Labour-led government for nearly seven years now, and despite their rhetoric about caring for the environment, all they’ve managed to come up with in that time is a highly-suspect visual smoke test to determine which vehicles are emitting harmful pollutants and which aren’t,” said Kerr.
“Not only is this up to the eyesight (under widely varying light conditions) and opinion of hundreds of individual garage mechanics, but it’s clearly going to be easier to identify offending diesel vehicles instead of equally harmful petrol vehicles. The whole thing is a nonsense.”
According to the MIA, the problem could be largely eliminated at source by a rolling age ban on used imported vehicles.
“Without this protection, New Zealand will continue to be the destination of choice for the world’s most environmentally-unsound old vehicles.
“The ‘feather duster’ approach to in-service emissions testing will only serve to cause grief for those of limited means who’ve been suckered into buying vehicles which should never have been allowed into the country in the first place,” added Kerr.
